EarthLink redirect service poses security risk, expert says

Comments

Related

Active Comments

Russ McRee says: Google has the same issue, it's used by spammers, and could easily be used by phishers. Unprotected redirect services are...

Read the rest | Reply

royharper says: The study points out why I've been using OpenDNS for over a year as my DNS server, although I use...

Read the rest | Reply

All Comments (2) | Post New

• Moving to a start-up? Fasten your seatbelt
• License server glitch exposes SonicWall users to e-mail security threats
• Clues point to Jan. 13 release of Windows 7 beta
• Chinese city requires Net cafes to use legitimate software
• U.S. Report: Major terror attack by 2013

Zone

The Security Zone With the mobility of employees and the ease with which external devices can be brought in and out of a network, continuing to build your security plan for network servers and clients is a must. Fortunately, there is much that organizations can do to protect themselves from attacks - internal and external. Having the right policies, procedures and server configurations is critical... Learn more in The Security Zone See All Zones

April 19, 2008 (IDG News Service) A vulnerability in servers used by EarthLink Inc. to handle mistyped Web page requests may have allowed attackers to launch undetectable phishing attacks against any Internet site, according to a noted Internet security researcher.

The bug, which was patched earlier this week, underscores a fundamental security risk in the way that some Internet service providers are attempting to generate advertising revenue from mistyped Web addresses, said Dan Kaminsky, director of penetration testing at IOActive Inc., a security consulting firm.

The vulnerability was in a service called Barefruit, which EarthLink has been using since August 2006 to return Web pages with search terms and advertising to customers who mistype a domain name in their browser.

London-based Barefruit operates a service that works with Domain Name System (DNS) servers, which are used by the browser to translate domain names, such as Yahoo.com, into numerical Internet Protocol addresses. Typically, when a browser asks a DNS server for a nonexistent Internet address -- adsewrds.yahoo.com, for example -- the DNS server returns an error message indicating that no such address exists. With Barefruit's servers, the user is told that the address does exist and is then sent to a Web page that displays advertising and suggested search terms.

Because of a bug in the software used to redirect users to these advertising and search pages, Kaminsky was able to get the pages to run his own JavaScript code. With the browser treating this code as if it were from a legitimate domain, Kaminsky was able to steal users' cookies, create fake Web sites that appeared to be hosted on legitimate domains, and even log into certain Web sites without authorization.

Generating revenue from domain name typos has generated controversy before. In 2003, domain name registrar VeriSign was forced to disable a similar system called SiteFinder, which redirected Web surfers who had typed nonexistent domains.

EarthLink is not the only Internet service provider to be testing this system. Kaminsky said he found evidence of Barefruit or similar systems being tested on Verizon, Time Warner, Qwest and Comcast, which outsources some of its network to EarthLink.

"The security of the entire Web for these ISPs is right now limited by the security of some random ad server run by a British company," he said. "Somebody running an ad server controls the security of whitehouse.gov. This is not a good situation."

A Verizon Communications Inc. spokesman said that his company was not using the Barefruit service.

In a statement, EarthLink confirmed that it had patched Kaminsky's bug but did not address the broader security concerns that Kaminsky believes are raised by this model.

Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2008 International Data Group. All rights reserved.