ISO confirms approval of OOXML, gives two months to appeal
Microsoft must wait for appeal process to run its course
Active Comments
The Security Zone
With the mobility of employees and the ease with which external devices can be brought in and out of a network, continuing to build your security plan for network servers and clients is a must. Fortunately, there is much that organizations can do to protect themselves from attacks - internal and external. Having the right policies, procedures and server configurations is critical... Learn more in The Security Zone See All Zones
|
April 2, 2008 (IDG News Service) The ISO standards body today confirmed that its members have approved adoption of a draft standard based on Microsoft Corp.'s Office Open XML document format, a day after the company itself declared victory.
But Microsoft will have to wait at least until June before it can lay its hands on a copy of a formal ISO standard for the format, as it waits for the Geneva-based organization's formal appeals process to run its course.
"Subject to there being no formal appeals from ISO/IEC national bodies in the next two months," the text of the standard will be published as ISO/IEC 29500, the standards body said.
If any national standards organizations make appeals to JTC1 — the Joint Technical Committee of ISO and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) that worked on the draft — then Microsoft may have to wait several months longer while the appeal is heard, according to Section 11 of the ISO/IEC JTC1 Directives.
Only so-called P-members of JTC1 — in this case, the 41 countries that participated in development of the standard — can appeal the committee's actions. They must show that an action is either not in accordance with the JTC1 Directives, or not in the best interests of international trade and commerce or such public factors as safety, health and the environment.
Decisions on a draft international standard, such as that for OOXML, "are only eligible for consideration if questions of principle are involved; the contents of a draft may be detrimental to the reputation of IEC or ISO, or the point giving rise to objection was not known to JTC1 ... during earlier discussions," according to the directives.
The prospect of an appeal can't be ruled out.
"There are a few countries in which process issues are being raised," said Jason Matusow, a Microsoft employee who blogs about interoperability and standards.
Count Norway among them: Members of the Norwegian standards committee have asked the country's Ministry of Trade and Industry to investigate the voting process. They want to know how the country came to register a vote approving adoption of the draft standard when a majority of committee members were against it.
Reprinted with permission from
Story copyright 2008 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Today's Top Stories
Resource Alerts
Webcasts
Web Threats Don't Discriminate
The Secure Web Gateway. Mission Critical For Business
Dynamic Data Center and Virtualization Drives Operational Excellence at Emory Healthcare
Editor's Picks
Clues point to Jan. 13 release of Windows 7 beta
Microsoft releases Vista SP2 beta
Obama's DHS pick may find support for raising H-1B cap at confirmation hearing
IBM wants info from Apple execs in Papermaster case
License server glitch exposes SonicWall users to e-mail security threats
Report: Former AOL chief exec tries to raise funds to buy Yahoo
Fired up about IT? Join Sharkbait and share your true tales of IT. SharkBait is the place for you to sound off about everything IT the good, the bad, and the rest of the weird stuff you deal with every day.New baits |
|
![]() |
|
Patrick Thibodeau: Satellite images of U.S military bases Which is more important? Helping terrorists or protecting military bases? Answer: protecting Web 2.0 ... [more] |
|
White Papers
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services.
|
||||||
|




Subscribe to
Computerworld 







Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services.


