Linux ignored, not immune, says hacker contest sponsor

Comments

Related

Active Comments

tracker says: ROTFL. MS or apple paid someone to write this bul*hit? How stupid should people be to say something like that?...

Read the rest | Reply

G David Lewis says: Linux is far from "ignored" from hack attempts. One look at the server log from any popular Linux web server...

Read the rest | Reply

All Comments (31) | Post New

• Three different hackers found 'Pwn To Own' bug
• Laptops 1, Hackers 0 as $20,000 prize goes unclaimed in hack challenge
• Clues point to Jan. 13 release of Windows 7 beta
• Chinese city requires Net cafes to use legitimate software
• Microsoft releases Vista SP2 beta

Zone

The Security Zone With the mobility of employees and the ease with which external devices can be brought in and out of a network, continuing to build your security plan for network servers and clients is a must. Fortunately, there is much that organizations can do to protect themselves from attacks - internal and external. Having the right policies, procedures and server configurations is critical... Learn more in The Security Zone See All Zones

April 1, 2008 (Computerworld) People shouldn't read anything into the fact that of the three laptops set up for last week's "PWN to OWN" hack challenge, the only one left standing was running Linux, said the security expert who oversaw the contest.

"There was just no interest in Ubuntu," said Terri Forslof, manager of security response at 3Com Corp.'s TippingPoint subsidiary, which put up the cash prizes awarded at the contest last week at CanSecWest. "A contest such as this is not a measure of relative security between operating systems. It's not an accurate barometer."

Just because the laptop -- a Sony running the Ubuntu 7.10 distribution of Linux -- was untouched doesn't mean that the operating system is any more secure than either Mac OS X or Windows Vista, both of which fell to attacks.

"It was actually a lack of interest" on the part of the PWN to OWN contestants, Forslof said. "[Shane Macaulay's] exploit would have worked on Linux. He could have knocked it over. But [the contestants] get a lot more mileage out of attacks on the Mac or Windows," she continued.

"Linux, it is what it is. The code is a lot more transparent. But vulnerabilities for Mac and Windows, those are the ones that are going to get the press," Forslof added.

Of the three notebooks, the first to go down was a MacBook Air. That machine was hacked last Thursday, the second day of the three-day challenge, by Charlie Miller, using a zero-day vulnerability in Safari. Friday, Macaulay breached a Windows Vista SP1-powered Fujitsu using a flaw in Adobe's Flash.

In both cases, the vulnerabilities were exchanged for cash prizes -- $10,000 for Miller, half that for Macaulay -- and acquired by TippingPoint's bug bounty program, Zero Day Initiative. The bugs have been reported to Apple Inc. and Adobe Systems Inc., respectively, so that the vulnerabilities can be closed.

By design, PWN to OWN's first day was reserved for exploits of remote code vulnerabilities on the operating systems themselves. No one managed to crack a computer that day. It wasn't until the notebooks' attack exposure was expanded -- first to any client-side application installed by default with the operating system, then to a larger group of third-party applications added to the machines -- that the MacBook Air and Fujitsu dropped.

"I really wasn't expecting anything that first day," Forslof said. Not only are vulnerabilities meeting PWN to OWN's first-day criteria harder to find and exploit, but they're also probably worth a lot more than the $20,000 TippingPoint offered that day, Forslof said. "We're talking about a worm-class issue here," she said.